In August 2020, Chicago rapper FBG Duck, whose real name was Carlton Weekly, became a victim of a fatal shooting on the Gold Coast of Chicago. He was attacked by a group of masked men while waiting to enter a Dolce & Gabbana store. This tragic incident also left his girlfriend, Kash Williams, and another man injured. Weekly, known for his contributions to the Chicago drill rap scene, was a prominent figure who had engaged in a highly publicized rivalry with other rappers, including Lil Durk. His death shook the community, and in the wake of this loss, his mother and others close to him have continued to seek justice.
Lawsuit Filed Against Lil Durk and Major Record Labels
Recently, Weekly’s mother, along with Williams and the second injured man, filed a lawsuit alleging that popular rapper Lil Durk played a role in orchestrating the killing. The lawsuit claims that a $100,000 bounty was placed on Weekly, spurred by an intense rivalry that had been playing out in drill rap songs for years. The feud between FBG Duck and Lil Durk, another Chicago-based rapper, has been marked by lyrical exchanges filled with references to violence, a theme not uncommon in the drill rap genre.
The lawsuit does not only target Lil Durk but also his record label, Only the Family (OTF), and other influential entities within the music industry. Sony, UMG, and Interscope, record labels with extensive influence and resources, are also named as defendants. The plaintiffs allege that these labels supported and even encouraged criminal activities for profit by partnering with artists like Lil Durk. The accusations claim that the industry seeks “authenticity,” which they argue has attracted artists involved in gang-related activities, fueling a culture that promotes real-life violence.
Roosevelt Allen’s Perspective on Accountability
The plaintiffs are represented by attorney Roosevelt Allen, who has been vocal about the responsibility he believes record labels should bear in this case. According to Allen, the music industry’s desire for authenticity has led labels to welcome artists with gang affiliations, allowing them to use their platforms to promote violence and criminal behavior. Allen accuses the labels of financing and developing the brands of these artists, ultimately profiting from the violent lifestyles they portray in their music. He argues that this encouragement has consequences that extend beyond music, impacting communities and leading to real-world violence, as seen in Weekly’s death.
Allen further explains that by filing this lawsuit, he and the plaintiffs hope to hold not only the individuals directly involved but also the larger organizations responsible. He argues that when gang-related disputes move from music into the public sphere, they can result in tragedy, as was the case with Weekly. Allen emphasizes that this lawsuit represents an opportunity to challenge the role of record labels in cultivating a climate where violence is both glorified and financially supported. He believes this case can set a precedent for accountability within the music industry, particularly concerning companies that profit from artists engaging in criminal activities.
Previous Convictions and Ongoing Investigation
Earlier this year, six individuals, alleged gang members, were convicted of carrying out Weekly’s murder. The convictions highlighted the gang-related motives behind the killing, which authorities believe may have been linked to the long-standing feud between Weekly and other drill rappers. This background of violence and gang rivalry is central to the lawsuit, which seeks to link these events to a larger pattern of behavior among the artists and the companies that promote them.
While the criminal investigation led to convictions, the plaintiffs believe that further action is necessary. They argue that the record labels, by promoting and funding the activities of artists with violent backgrounds, share a level of responsibility for the death of Weekly. Allen contends that as these companies continue to prioritize profit over public safety, they should be held liable for the consequences of their actions.
Industry Silence and Legal Response
The lawsuit has sparked a conversation about the music industry’s role in promoting violent imagery and the extent to which record labels should be held accountable. Attempts to reach representatives of Lil Durk, Sony, and other named record labels have thus far yielded no public response. It remains unclear how these organizations plan to address the allegations, though they are likely to face significant scrutiny in the wake of this high-profile case.
As this legal battle unfolds, it raises important questions about the responsibility of media companies in shaping public culture and the impact of the messages they amplify. For many, the case represents a turning point in the ongoing debate about accountability within the entertainment industry, particularly as it pertains to the glorification of gang-related violence. With the potential for this lawsuit to set a significant legal precedent, all eyes are now on the court to see how it will address the intersection of music, profit, and community harm.
Discover more from The Industry Dot Biz
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
