HomeMusic Industry TrendsFDA Panel Recommends Shield...

FDA Panel Recommends Shield Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

FDA Panel Recommends Shield Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

A blood test designed to screen for colorectal cancer is one step closer to approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On Thursday night, the Medical Devices Advisory Committee, an FDA advisory panel, recommended the approval of the Shield blood test, finding it safe, effective, and beneficial despite potential risks.

FDA Panel Recommends

Shield Blood Test Nears FDA Approval

Guardant Health, the company behind Shield, is seeking FDA premarket approval for the test to screen for colorectal cancer in individuals aged 45 and older at average risk. While Shield is not the first blood-based screening tool for colorectal cancer, it offers another option for detecting a type of cancer that increasingly affects younger Americans.

Shield is currently available commercially, but FDA approval would expand its availability and coverage, providing another screening choice. Guardant Health expects the FDA to decide on Shield’s premarket approval later in 2024. However, FDA approval is not guaranteed, as the agency sometimes diverges from its advisors’ recommendations.

Understanding Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer starts in the colon or rectum and is often referred to as colon or rectal cancer, depending on its origin. According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), most colorectal cancers develop from polyps, growths on the inner lining of the colon or rectum. While most polyps are benign, some can become cancerous over many years.

Symptoms of colorectal cancer include changes in bowel habits, rectal bleeding, blood in the stool, abdominal pain, weakness, fatigue, and sudden weight loss. Despite an overall decline in cancer deaths, the ACS reported an alarming increase in colon cancer among younger adults earlier this year. Colon cancer is now the leading cause of death among men under 50 and the second leading cause of death among women in the same age group.

Traditional Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods

Colonoscopies remain the gold standard for screening colorectal cancer. During this procedure, a doctor inserts a colonoscope—a long, thin, flexible tube with a camera on the end—through the anus to examine the rectum and colon, potentially biopsying any suspicious tissues or polyps.

Stool tests can also detect blood not visible to the naked eye, possibly indicating cancer. The United States Preventative Services Task Force recommends that adults aged 45 and older with average risk undergo colorectal cancer screening. This includes a stool test every one to three years or a colonoscopy every 10 years for asymptomatic individuals.

How Shield Works

Shield detects colorectal cancer by identifying DNA d by tumors in blood samples. Results are available about two weeks after the samples reach the laboratory. Clinical trial data publid in The New England Journal of Medicine showed that Shield has an 83.1% sensitivity rate and an 89.9% specificity rate. This means 83.1% of patients with colorectal cancer detected by a colonoscopy tested positive on the Shield blood test, and 89.9% of patients without cancer tested negative.

During the FDA advisory panel meeting, eight out of nine advisers voted yes on safety, six out of nine voted yes on efficacy, and seven out of nine voted yes on benefits outweighing risks.

Guardant Health asserts that the blood test will eliminate barriers associated with current screening methods like colonoscopies or stool-based tests, which can be time-consuming or challenging to complete. The blood test can be performed without special preparation and as part of a standard doctor’s visit.

Potential Drawbacks

Despite the high overall sensitivity rate, clinical trial data indicated that the Shield test might miss one in ten people with precancerous lesions and one in 1,000 people with cancerous lesions. These “false negatives” could result in tests finding no evidence of cancer when patients actually have precancerous or cancerous lesions.

Data also showed that Shield missed about 87% of advanced precancerous lesions, with a specificity rate of just 13.2%. Shield did not detect small lesions of less than 10 millimeters.

While the majority of the panel voted in favor of the test, some FDA advisers expressed concerns about appropriate patient counseling, patient misunderstanding of a “negative test,” and the language used in packaging and labeling.

Conclusion

The FDA panel’s recommendation for the approval of the Shield blood test marks a significant step forward in colorectal cancer screening. While it is not without its drawbacks, the test offers an additional, less invasive option for individuals at average risk, potentially increasing screening rates and early detection. As Guardant Health awaits the FDA’s decision, the future of colorectal cancer screening could see a promising new addition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXrkY0MVnYc

- A word from our sponsors -

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

Cincinnati’s ‘Smart Homes’ for the Disabled: Progress or PR Stunt?

Nine smart homes—yeah, that’s right—are being rolled out in Greater Cincinnati...

Trying to Silence the Watchdogs? Nonprofits Say ‘Not on Our Watch!

A coalition of nonprofit organizations has stepped up to defend the...

Crunch Time for Beets: Are We Finally Getting Snack-Worthy Veggies?

It’s about time someone took a good look at beets. That...

Honda’s Big Slip-Up: Over 70,000 Acura ILXs Recalled for Brake Defect

Honda is in the hot seat again. This time, it's the...

- A word from our sponsors -

Read Now

Cincinnati’s ‘Smart Homes’ for the Disabled: Progress or PR Stunt?

Nine smart homes—yeah, that’s right—are being rolled out in Greater Cincinnati for adults with developmental disabilities. The idea sounds pretty nice on the surface. High-tech living for those who truly need it. But here's the deal: is this genuine progress or just a shiny distraction? Let’s take a...

Trying to Silence the Watchdogs? Nonprofits Say ‘Not on Our Watch!

A coalition of nonprofit organizations has stepped up to defend the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) from what can only be described as a blatant power grab by the Trump-Vance administration. This isn’t just a fight over funding; it’s about keeping a...

Crunch Time for Beets: Are We Finally Getting Snack-Worthy Veggies?

It’s about time someone took a good look at beets. That deep-red root vegetable has long been relegated to the sidelines - maybe a side dish at best, a bold smoothie choice at worst. But here’s the deal: new tech’s stepping in, turning those humble beets into...

Honda’s Big Slip-Up: Over 70,000 Acura ILXs Recalled for Brake Defect

Honda is in the hot seat again. This time, it's the Acura ILX that's making headlines—over 70,000 of these vehicles from model years 2014 to 2020 are getting yanked back due to a defect in the hydraulic braking system. Yeah, you read that right. More than 70,000...

Big Shots Gather—But Who Actually Benefits?

The Longwood Healthcare Leaders San Francisco CEO meeting happened, and you can bet the usual suspects were in attendance. A gathering of biopharma's elite – CEOs, heads of R&D, and other top brass. It sounds fancy, right? Big names throwing around big ideas, with Wilson Sonsini tagging...

Product Recalls: Another Day, Another Danger

Another day, another round of consumer product recalls. It’s almost like clockwork at this point. If you're a regular shopper, you might feel like the odds of picking up something dangerous are increasing. Just last week, several products were pulled from shelves due to safety concerns—everything from...

Manhattan Real Estate: A Mirage of Stability?

Manhattan's real estate scene is apparently finding its footing again. Office demand is tightening, and retail is making a comeback. At least, that's what Liz Hart, the President of Leasing for Newmark North America, wants us to believe. She recently spoke with Open Interest about how 2026...

Europe’s Tech Doldrums: Should We Care?

Look, Europe’s lagging behind in the tech race, and here we are, pretending it doesn’t matter. It’s like watching a marathon where one's still on the starting line while others are crossing the finish. So what’s going on? The continent's been struggling to keep pace with Silicon...

Only 3% of Artists Want Opt-Out? You’ve Got to Be Kidding Me

The art world is buzzing—it’s supposed to be a victory for artists in their ongoing battle with AI over copyright. But here’s the kicker: only 3% of them are actually in favor of opting out of AI training programs. Seems a bit fishy, doesn’t it? Liz Kendall, the...

Legal Fumble: Hyde School Lawsuit Stumbles Amid Attorney Blunders

Last week, the federal lawsuit against the Bath boarding school hit a snag. A lawyer from Maine asked to step back from the case, citing some serious missteps by his co-counsel in Massachusetts. Apparently, we’re not just dealing with legal battles here; we’re also talking about 'inaccurate...

Gainesville Businesses Hit with a Wave of ADA Lawsuits – What’s Really Going On?

Gainesville's small business scene just took a gut punch. A slew of 49 lawsuits has blindsided iconic local establishments, all tied to ADA compliance issues. Just when these owners thought they could catch a break, they're now forced to either settle or brace for costly legal battles. Here's...

So, Is Residential Real Estate Really Balanced Now?

Today’s real estate market is apparently balanced. Not quite a buyer’s bonanza—but hey, it’s “tilting in favor of buyers.” Isn’t that a comforting thought? But let’s dig deeper. The phrase “balanced” sounds good on paper, but what does it actually mean for those trying to buy or...