Monday, May 13, 2024
https://youtu.be/CuhoWmG975c?si=BVwp01sbqfFJ_qve
https://youtu.be/CuhoWmG975c?si=BVwp01sbqfFJ_qve

Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

The Songwriter’s Soul: Brenda Russell’s Creative World

Explore the essence of Brenda Russell, Grammy-nominated artist, and her illustrious career in soul, jazz fusion, and pop music. Uncover her hits and tour dates.
Home2007thru2010Is Reach Media (Tom Joyner ) Suit Against Clear Channel's V103 in...

Is Reach Media (Tom Joyner ) Suit Against Clear Channel’s V103 in Chicago “Sour Grapes?”

Do you see why I don’t like syndication?….What in the world is Reach Media THINKING? Tom Joyner , the SEASONED veteran is STILL (apparently) steaming over the show being dropped this past spring and replaced by Steve Harvey.   Granted,   he only has a hand ful of Clear Channel affiliates but how will this pan out for the other stations carrying the show who may be thinking about….. ANYWAY…   Should Tom REALLY continue to bring national attention to this previously dead issue?   This simply appears… TO ME…. to be sour grapes and while he may have lost affiliate dollars, it drives my point home EVEN FURTHER about why we MUST TRIM the syndicated lard at urban radio. The money he claims to have lost is more than some MULTIPLE full timers make at some urban stations COMBINED ($116,000). Sure that amount is no drop in the bucket to the rest of us but to Tom? What’s REALLY going on with that show’s revenue? Is suing for that amount even worth the possible national repercussions? Here’s the story from the Chicago Tribune…