Background
The Dallas Mavericks are down 0-3 in the NBA Finals, an obstacle no team in NBA history has overcome. Meanwhile, the Dallas Cowboys had a disappointing end to their season, exiting in the wildcard round with a 48-32 loss to the Green Bay Packers.
Stephen A. Smith’s Opinion
Stephen A. Smith argues that the Mavericks’ performance in the Finals is more disappointing than the Cowboys’ playoff exit. He had higher expectations for the Mavericks, especially given the presence of star players Kyrie Irving and Luka Dončić. In contrast, Smith had low expectations for the Cowboys due to their history of playoff failures.
Kimberly Martin’s Perspective
Kimberly Martin disagrees with Smith, stating that the Cowboys are more disappointing because their failures have become routine despite being one of the most valuable franchises in sports. She highlights the high expectations and significant financial investment in the Cowboys, making their consistent underperformance unacceptable.
Andrea Carter’s View
Andrea Carter sides with Stephen A. Smith, pointing out that the Mavericks exceeded expectations by making it to the Finals after the trade deadline. Despite their struggles in the Finals, the Mavericks’ run should be celebrated for reaching this stage.
Stephen A. Smith’s Additional Points
Smith emphasizes that he expected more from the Mavericks due to their star power and potential. He also notes that the Mavericks’ success would have increased pressure on the Cowboys, which he would have enjoyed.
Conclusion
The debate highlights differing views on expectations and disappointment. While Smith and Carter see the Mavericks’ Finals performance as more disappointing due to higher expectations, Martin argues that the Cowboys’ ongoing playoff failures are the greater disappointment given their history and financial status.
